monbla256
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2012
- Messages
- 8,704
- Reaction score
- 9
They sized their standard shapes 1 thru 4 which were NOT equivalent to Dunhill's group sizes as Charatan's numbers were around a 1/2 to full size LARGER than a correspondingly numbered Dunnie.riff raff":4baqth3j said:That is interesting Monblac. I didn't know the significance of the 2 in the first digit of the shape number.
Here's a reference shape and price wise of their standard shapes back in 1970 that might help. It's a copy of the "catalog/brochure" available at B&M's at that time. I have a couple I picked up filed away.
http://www.tecon-gmbh.de/info_pages.php?pages_id=121%3FosCsid%3D093163f4f79f9136b21700ce1bdf1f80&language=en&osCsid=28818b9eab896a9fc57621f11a90566a