idbowman
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2011
- Messages
- 2,064
- Reaction score
- 20
Yep...pretty much the same. Probably more in the 48-54 range, though.ZeroContent":nw27eiov said:what about a range? any combo of 5"-8" and 48-60 ring.
Yep...pretty much the same. Probably more in the 48-54 range, though.ZeroContent":nw27eiov said:what about a range? any combo of 5"-8" and 48-60 ring.
Doc, the larger ring gauges have a more open draw, and consequently the smoke is much cooler.Doc Manhattan":r7v8f2t1 said:Honest question: why is that? I'm a very occasional cigar smoker, so I've never been (and will never be) able to make even an anecdotal comparison. But shouldn't a larger burning surface area produce more heat, all other factors being equal?Dutch":r7v8f2t1 said:A larger ring gauge smokes much cooler
Typically 4-7" and anywhere from 40 to 46. 'Though, as I've said before, I'll make exceptions on the RG (Tatuaje Face, Opus Double Corona and Opus Power Ranger).ZeroContent":6l8lwejp said:what about a range? any combo of 5"-8" and 48-60 ring.
I have to respectfully disagree wit your first two points. Any size cigar can be plugged or have a tight draw and as far as getting too hot, ever smoke a Liga Privada Flying Pig? The absolute KEY to enjoying that cigar is not over-puffing.Dutch":5ovyz48h said:Doc, the larger ring gauges have a more open draw, and consequently the smoke is much cooler.Doc Manhattan":5ovyz48h said:Honest question: why is that? I'm a very occasional cigar smoker, so I've never been (and will never be) able to make even an anecdotal comparison. But shouldn't a larger burning surface area produce more heat, all other factors being equal?Dutch":5ovyz48h said:A larger ring gauge smokes much cooler
It's much easier to ruin a small cigar by smoking it too fast, leaving the last third of the stick very bitter. It is usually much easier to "nub" the larger ring gauges.
As with pipe tobacco, the less heat involved, the better the chance to taste the transitions in the tobacco as you smoke it.
You have no idea how many people come into the cigar shop, light up a toro, and nub it 45 minutes later. I have no idea how they're tasting anything other than "burnt". A 5x42 usually takes me about 60-70 minutes to smoke!Behike54":e9et5qkp said:I am agreement about heat and flavor. I see guys torching their cigars like they are welders and I just see a cigar circling the drain. Terrible.
:cheers:Behike54":bnyyemoc said:The absolute KEY to enjoying that cigar is not over-puffing.
with a thinner RG the pressure created from suction is greater than it would be with a larger RG. alot like using a smaller nozzle on a hose will give you more pressure. that said... i personally prefer small ring gauges, just draw more gently and there is no problem. actually i'd argue that smoking a thin RG slowly offers much more flavorful and complex smoke than large RG cigars can, because large RG cigars use a higher percentage of volado to keep them burning well.Doc Manhattan":tsoikbkl said:Honest question: why is that? I'm a very occasional cigar smoker, so I've never been (and will never be) able to make even an anecdotal comparison. But shouldn't a larger burning surface area produce more heat, all other factors being equal?Dutch":tsoikbkl said:A larger ring gauge smokes much cooler
you like ERdM and RG do ya? i think they are seriously underrated marcas... two of my favorites. PM me your address, i've got a few cigars i think you'll enjoy, and i'd love to get your take on them.alfredo_buscatti":ae30detm said:I've smoked several Illusione Holy Lance lanceros and a Cuban El Rey Del Mundo corona as well as a Cuban Flor de Raphael Gonzalez corona. The Illusione's flavor was sophisticated and savory while the ERdM exploded with flavors. I only had one; it would take me a half dozen of them to learn how to control that explosion by sorting the flavors. The RG was exactly what my stereotyped Cuban expectations dictated: sophisticated, complex flavors that present as a unit, medium. Loved loved loved it!
Enter your email address to join: