Ozark Wizard":v05x32pr said:
You know, Codgersville is the capitol of Geezerdom. They have a couple of nice brewpubs in the Old Quarter....
Good brewpubs will certainly be an added bonus, provided they are available by foot or public transport. No way am I drinking and driving anymore. Did plenty of that in my misspent youth and lived to tell about it. No, I'm not proud of it.
It seems likely that I'll get back into homebrewing, but will have to start from scratch, as I sold off all my gear many years ago.
However, it seems I'm hijacking my own thread, as it's devolving into my retirement issues. Let's correct that and get back into the issue of when one is considered a Senior Citizen.
As far as what I truly feel is the right age for this distinction - frankly it's too hard to put down to a particular number. I always thought of my grandparents as elderly when I was a kid, and by extension Senior Citizens (although I never classified them as Senior Citizens, only that they were elderly and very probably in their 80's when I was a young'un. Guess it equates to the same thing).
So perhaps my sentiments are that the classification of Senior Citizens should begin somewhere around 80? And of course this should be a moving target and not a fixed number. After all, there are plenty of vibrant and active older folks in their 70's and 80's (and indeed beyond) who defy the stigma of "Seniors". I wish to be one of that group going forward, into my 80's.
My own Pap lived to 88, and his several brothers around that. So I have those genetics going for me, provided I take care of myself properly.
Am I a Senior Citizen now at 65? Perhaps, in the view of those in their 20's or younger. But I clearly don't feel like it. Just a guy who has been around the block a couple times!
Cheers,
RR