DrT999":ookr6wtm said:
fsu92john":ookr6wtm said:
Brian K. Pennington
Was Hinduism Invented?: Britons, Indians, and the Colonial Construction of Religion
(Oxford, 2005)
While I can see how the answer would be yes (there were lots of different groups with related practices -- and some not so related practices -- combined by European scholars under the rubric 'hinduism') I'm curious if you think the author makes the case strong enough to believe the term itself should be discounted (or at least changed to something like 'Hinduisms').
Actually, Pennington argues the opposite, that in spite of the diversity of beliefs and practices embraced by the term, it is meaningful to speak of "Hinduism" provided one avoids essentialism in doing so. The book appears (I'm not finished with it yet) to be attempting to correct against a strong "Hinduism is a Western construct" tendency in post-colonial studies.