I'm confused by this hierarchy of what constitutes a "writer." :scratch:
A writer is someone who writes. Anything beyond a comprehensive shopping list probably makes someone a writer. No, I'm not being a smart-ass with that, either. I'll explain my point of view.
In certain opinion (past and present), you are a "writer" if you do so professionally, and you are "professional" if you have your work published. The more locations, or more books if you choose, in which you are published, determined your success as writer. I think more people are apt to call themselves a writer if they write, rather than if they have something published. I think this also makes professional writers roll their eyes a bit.
I use this compared to musicians, since that was brought up as well. There's the guy who goes to the guitar store, plays a guitar (same licks, same tune) every single time. Perhaps a guitar comes out with buddies drinking in the garage and they mess around a little. Are they musicians? I suppose in some way, they are. Personally, I have toured, been in plenty of bands and projects, made songs, written albums, even built and maintained my own instruments, yet I have a hard time calling myself a "musician" because I don't feel I have completed the level of talent I would like to have.
Yet, I have never been published with much credit, paid-for or been directly acknowledged as a "writer." I consider myself not only a writer, but a pretty good one. I have run two local blogs here in my hometown, written ad copy (my own and others), written for business owners on behalf of periodicals, have countless subjects and musings scattered about paper and digital manuscripts, and have a cavalier and unorganized approach to a what I feel is a very organized and linear craft: writing. I wouldn't know the first thing about getting published or finding gainful employment as a writer. In addition, three friends of mine who were preparing their final thesis as English majors came to ME as someone to give an objectified and corrective opinion on their work. Not that it says anything, but it sure made my high school drop-out shame diminish a little. Contrary to my music, I'm 100% confident in my ability to write.
I will likely never be paid for my writing, though I'd consider doing it for pay under the right circumstances. Does this make me a hobbyist or am I serious? I'm not sure. I know for a fact I'm a hobbyist musician, as I'll never sleep in vans, garages and play for peanuts likely again, but I'll always have instruments and ideas resonating off the project room walls, which include stacks of journals which may never see the light of day. 8)
I enjoy myself in text. If it goes further, so be it.