Truly, I'm not trying to be pendantic here, but that's just one article, and it says nothing about brain development at all. And the NPR article that cited it then says:
"(Some of these studies also suggest workarounds, which many practitioners are using)." And the one psychiatrist was talking about children 3 (or was it 5?) years old. They aren't going to school, other than some children going to kindergarten. It sounds like a lot of confusing, and inapplicable, information bouncing all over the place.
Hmmm…I don’t see a problem with having kids mask up in order to protect adults. It seems like that would be something a socially responsible society would WANT to do. There’s no data on how many little ones spread the virus to a relative, family friend, neighbor, teacher, etc. But in general, stopping the spread of the virus (protecting adults from getting it) is the whole point.
Agreed. protecting people. Adults, older family members, teachers, crap workers at the school making $15/hour in the cafeteria and janitors, and the list goes on. I certainly have empathy for the children and how this must be affecting their view of the world, but kids are incredibly resilient. And the fact that they're all doing it, so safety in numbers, would possibly lessen the impact as it is normalized to them. How have the Japanese and Asian children been affected by masks? While they aren't/weren't wearing them as much, it's not entirely new territory. Normalization goes a long way to soften impact.
"True, a cloth mask can be a "marginally OK to maybe a decent filter," Marr says. But with something as highly transmissible as omicron, just "OK" isn't good enough." So, as I read that, they aren't totally useless. Better is better, but OK is not worst. From the NPR article.